Woodworking software comparison
PolyBoard and Aleker Designer do not answer exactly the same need. PolyBoard is very efficient for rule-guided panel furniture; Aleker targets a broader trade CAD workflow for custom work, plans and the workshop.
Quick verdict
Repeatable cabinet: PolyBoard. Broad custom work: Aleker.
Direct comparison
| Criterion | PolyBoard | Aleker Designer |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation | Panel furniture / cabinet | Custom woodworking and interior fitting |
| Method | Assistants, rules and components | Trade-focused 3D drawing, plans, cutting lists and production |
| Strong area | Kitchens, dressing rooms, repeatable cabinets | Varied projects, special shapes, complete workshop workflow |
| Workshop outputs | Very furniture and production oriented | Drawing sheets, cutting lists, manufacturing file and exports |
| Flexibility | Very efficient inside its perimeter | Freer when the project leaves the standard cabinet perimeter |
Your activity mainly revolves around panel furniture, cabinets, dressing rooms or repeatable kitchens. The assistant-based workflow is fast when projects stay within that frame.
Your daily work mixes drawing, fitting, woodworking, technical plans, cutting lists and production. Aleker is better suited when the project becomes truly custom.
Aleker workflow
The goal is to reduce back-and-forth between several tools: design, plan, cutting list, manufacturing and workshop exchanges remain in the same environment.
Step 1
Survey and 3D drawing of the project
Step 2
Adaptation of dimensions and constraints
Step 3
Drawing sheets automatically linked to the model
Step 4
Cutting lists, exports and manufacturing file
Conclusion
If your company mainly produces standardised cabinets, PolyBoard can be very relevant. If you draw varied custom work and want continuity between study, customer, workshop and installation, Aleker Designer deserves a demonstration.
